Grouped desktop launcher panels on Plasma 6, and five things that fail silently

I’ve spent the last few days building a small tool that groups desktop launchers into titled panels in Plasma 6 — the kind of thing desktop organiser tools do on Windows. It’s called Paddocks: a TOML file describes the groups, and it builds them out of stock Quicklaunch widgets. GitHub - SonicP3L1C4N/paddocks: Grouped desktop launcher panels for KDE Plasma 6, plus the undocumented Plasma behaviour needed to build them · GitHub

I’m not posting to advertise it. Plasma could already do nearly all of this — the problem is that the route there is undocumented, and several steps along the way fail silently. I’ve filed what I found, and there’s a design question at the end that I’d value opinions on.

What I filed

  • 524242 — desktop:/ subpaths list correctly, but launching a .desktop file through one exits 0 and starts nothing. A Folder View pointed at desktop:/Apps renders a perfect grid of inert icons.

  • 524243 — Folder View at a file:// URL labels .desktop files by filename rather than Name=, while desktop:/ labels the same files correctly.

  • 524244 — plasma-apply-desktoptheme reports success and writes plasmarc while AutomaticLookAndFeel silently overrides the result.

  • 524245 — the theme pixmap cache is keyed by theme name only, so editing a theme in place never invalidates it.

  • 524246 — translucent/widgets/background.svgz ships in every theme and appears to be referenced by nothing.

  • 524247 — wishlist: no way to set the opacity of a widget’s background frame.

I also added a comment to 362511 (setting widget geometry from the scripting API, open since 2016) describing the failure mode: Qt is undefined, so Qt.rect() throws, assigning a plain object is silently discarded, and reading the property back returns the auto-placed position — so it looks as though Plasma accepted the value and then re-laid out over the top of it.

The design question

That last one is why I’m posting rather than only filing. Because widget geometry can’t be set from scripting, the only way to place a widget is to stop plasmashell, write ItemGeometries-x to plasma-org.kde.plasma.desktop-appletsrc, and start plasmashell again. That’s a private format behind a shell restart. Anything built in this space is fragile by construction — a point release can change the format and break every tool relying on it.

So the question is: does Plasma want grouped desktop organisation natively? And if it is, what’s the right shape — a containment feature, a widget, or simply making the layout scripting API able to place things, so external tools stop needing the back door?

I’d genuinely rather this tool became unnecessary than adopted. If the answer is “that belongs in the containment”, that’s a better outcome than me maintaining a workaround indefinitely.

Caveats, so nobody wastes time

Tested on exactly one machine: Plasma 6.6.6, Kubuntu 26.04, Wayland, a single 3440×1440 screen. Multi-monitor is unhandled. It’s Python and uses no KDE Frameworks — it talks to Plasma over D-Bus and config files.

I used Claude Code throughout this: working out Plasma’s config internals, chasing down the failure modes above, and writing Paddocks itself. Everything in those reports is behaviour I reproduced on the machine described above — the commands in them are commands I ran, and the observed results are what I saw. Where I wasn’t certain, the report says so rather than asserting; 524243 states outright that it may be intentional and should be closed as NOTABUG if so. Flagging it because I’d rather be up front than have anyone wonder.

Happy to test patches on any of the above; I have a setup that reproduces all of it.

Correction to the post above: that should read ItemGeometries-<W>x<H>.

I think there is a Windows utility called “Paddocks” if my list of useless information in my head serves me correctly. Based on the old Stardock Fences which I’m sure is the utility you’re probably basing this on.

I can only speak for myself, but I’ve never found having anything on the desktop very useful when the applications I use are covering it. I see no point in closing all those windows just to see a desktop when I could just as easily have a dock or panel that shows what I want in front of the open applications.

The only time I can think a desktop was any use to me was back when I was managing corporate windows servers and I’d put custom wallpapers on each server with critical information particular to that machine that you needed to know before doing anything.