The faded look of the inactive side was enough for me, so when I switched to the unstable branch of Manjaro I instantly disliked this yet another board light on an increasingly busy UI. It feels like accessibility features are forced upon users that do not need them.
I switched to unstable precisely to run from some other UI regressions.
Oh, well… I love KDE and Dolphin and UI papercuts multiplying by the day just saddens me. I wish KDE team would have funds to do proper UI research.
Thank you! I think that your Dolphin being an older version is the reason it does not have this issue. It didn’t happen on Manjaro-stable with Dolphin 25.12, also.
See if that can grow on you at least please. We’d (as in Dolphin contributors) rather fix bugs and add features, than add a setting for every UI elements (The latest release added a setting for the tab width…) and then other users will complain “there is too many options” which is also legitimate.
Themes can still be tweaked.
Yet successful apps need to take affirmative choices, we can’t sugar coated for every users.
It feels an accessibility feature to me because it seems related to contrast, and contrast requirements can be found in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.
I was not able to grasp the extent of the usability testing done for this from the links provided. I also fear that the current method of sampling users’ choices favors the vocal few.
Oh well, I still love KDE and Dolphin, and, given some time without surprises, I’ll probably develop some UI-blindness.