I am unable to post a comment at KDE BZ

I attempted to post the undermentioned in response to id=474135#c17:

(In reply to john.liptrot from comment #17)

> > For devices on decently slow, but not massively slow, networks, couldn't
> > parallel downloads increase performance, though?
> 
> More is not necessarily better. More parallel connections = more TCP
> handshakes, more DNS lookups, more packets through the network, every lost
> packet must be retransmitted etc. Lost packets are infinitely worse on
> wireless compared to wired connections. One sequential stream is easier for
> every single link in the chain, and there's always a bottleneck, be it CPU
> speed, LAN throughput, hard drive IOPS, internet connection speed etc.

Then the difference here is that I've a good CPU connected via Category 7 RJ-45 802.3 (so a fast LAN), but my gateway and broadband aren't quick. See https://www.speedtest.net/result/18012165677.

> Is it that much of an issue though? I would prefer to have an update take a
> little bit longer without breaking things than try to run as fast as
> possible and possibly max out my CPU, bog down the WI-FI etc.

I have other people who need to use the network. For me, that's very important. I don't care if I use all of my CPU (which I definitely shan't when doing an update anyway).

However, I saw:

Your comment has been automatically blocked as it is believed to contain spam. Please contact Sysadmin if you believe this to be incorrect.

I’m uncertain how to report this to bugs.kde.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=bugs.kde.org without it being flagged. Is #kde-sysadmin:kde.org a better avenue? I don’t really have the time for synchronous communications.

It’s probably the “18012165677” being interpreted as a phone number.

In general try to post text in Bugzilla comments, not markup, code, or unnecessary links.

1 Like

@ngraham, the link provides network connection information, if you view it. It was fairly integral to my point, I think…

Thanks. That explains a few false positives. I’d report it, but I doubt it’s important enough or anyone to put the effort into resolving it.

It’s good to provide information in bugzilla tickets, but there’s such a thing as too much information. Like, nobody needs evidence of your actual network speeds. You can just mention what they are, if this information is relevant to the topic of the bugzilla ticket.

@ngraham, I’ll try to trust that they’ll be trusting. Thanks.