All I want to do with krfb is have it run so when my remote system using it boots up, I can access it remotely - and yet, there’s almost no documentation on how to do this and krfb is acting like it is designed to disallow unattended remote access.
Is krfb abandon at this point? I’ve made two posts asking for help and one was up for a while before I found the answer myself, so I’m finding that on the official KDE forum, help for krfb seems scarce. I am not trying to be combative or argumentative or blaming at this point, but I just want to do ONE SIMPLE THING and I can’t find documentation for help, can’t get help here, and the program is not behaving as it should.
I’ve also found NO official documentation on the command line arguments or the config file (.config/krfbrc).
And I’m finding behaviors that make me ask, “Did the developers actually USE this in real life after they finished?”
I know building and maintaining KDE is not easy and even one program, like krfb, requires a lot of work, but this is frustrating. But when it’s not possible to use a program for remote access to a system without a lot of work and a fight, then something is wrong.
First, I wanted krfb to start without opening a window. I put it in Autostart, but it had to open the window. I found I could add “–nodialog” (I used 2 en-dashes, not one em-dash as autocorrect did) to autostart. Did that. It STILL opens the window.
Once it opens the window, it means it’s attended access, so I have to use the attended access password, which is random and, even when I save it, it’s changed each time KDE starts up.
This makes it IMPOSSIBLE to use krfb for remote access UNLESS there is someone at the computer. It won’t start without a dialog, even with the argument for no dialog, so it ONLY starts with a dialog, forcing attended access and the random password changes.
I want help on this, but previous posts about krfb issues aren’t getting responses, there is no man page, no page on the KDE website documenting options, or what I can do in the krfbrc file.
This makes me wonder if the project is abandon or if the devs intentionally want to make it hard to use for unattended access. (Clearly starting with a dialog even when the argument to not do that is used is a bug - but, at this point, I don’t know if it’s even worth reporting it.)