The archwiki article you linked mentions that the iwd backend for networkmanager is experimental. It referred to it as “the experimental iwd backend” which you need to go out of your way to enable.
So, it shouldn’t be too surprising that some things don’t work in that configuration…
Honestly everything for the most part works really well, and I get faster connections and auto-connects with IWD over wpa_supplicant this is the only problem that I noticed after using IWD for a while and was trying to share a password and noticed that there was no Share option via QR and after hours of searching, I’m surprised no one else noticed this, so I thought of documenting it here because it felt like a plasma-ui issue
Could also just not have been reported.
Sometimes people who encounter non-breaking bugs just continue without reporting them on bugs.kde.org
It could be.
While it is likely that the IWD integration in NetworkManager itself might not be reporting the network’s properties correctly, it could also be that the decision logic in the UI for when to display the “share” option is too strict
Yes this is definitely related a lot of the networks when using iwd as a backend keep showing security as insecure but with wpa_supplicant it shows the proper protocol
So ig that means this is more a iwd issue where iwd is unable to show the right security protocol than a plasma issue and looking at the bug report it’s also probably a Network-Manager issue