Recently i got involved in kde as contributor and i needed a kde-distro to work on some stuff. Since, I was unable to dual boot, using Neon seemed easy as virtual machine.
here are the distro details:
RETTY_NAME=“KDE neon 6.2”
NAME=“KDE neon”
VERSION_ID=“24.04”
VERSION=“6.2”
VERSION_CODENAME=noble
ID=neon
ID_LIKE=“ubuntu debian”
I have never used a dev version of any distro before. Does all the packages in those gets updated regularly? Also if I had to update, lets say “plasma version” in that, would sudo pkcon update do the trick?
Are there any fallbacks of those unstable versions do I need to know about?
Neon Testing will have the more beta level releases, and Unstable/Dev will be more —wild, if you will.
I’d suggest Testing for now. This has the current Beta version you need. All of the neon versions are updated quite regularly. Daily, even for testing and Unstable, which might make your work a bit more difficult.
Whenever there is a new Plasma version, it would come as part of your normal updates.
I also suggest for these to not use pkcon, but use apt directly. pkcon is just a layer on top that uses apt. If there are packaging issues, which are not uncommon on a fast-moving environments, pkcon won’t provide enough tools to get around these.