But I really need help as I need to get back to work
basically is what the link says, plasmashell is rapidly consuming all my RAM (64GB real memory + 64GB disk swap) and I don’t know the cause of this
I removed the plasmoids I had and only thing left are wallpapers and taskbar on each screen (3).
Can somebody please help me fix this? I don’t know how to do proper tracking of the possible issue, this never happened to me before
Arch GNU/Linux KDE Wayland, all software to latest version
Personally I’d turn off the wallpapers and set the background to a plain color. See if the memory issue goes away. I have many KDE systems and all of them are either “plain solid color” background or custom image as a background. I don’t like any of the wallpapers, I just take a image I’ve found or taken that I like and make that my backgrounds. I don’t have any problems with plasmashell memory when I do that.
Do you maybe use slide-shows as wallpaper settings? In the past KDE has had problems with that, filling memory with new picture which was shown. Since you have 3 screens it might even go faster that way.
I haven’t heard that this error has appeared again but it could be, it wouldn’t be the first time, nor the second.
No, that’s not it. Just tried it and in 5 minutes with a new picture every 2 seconds memory use did not increase at all.
Maybe somebody has a better idea. Success.
Create a new user, login to your desktop with that user with the default plasma settings. I would bet it’s one of the plugins that has a memory leak somewhere. If you don’t observe the high memory usage with the default desktop for that new user, then there is your proof.
When I work around something is because nobody listened to me.
I suggested limiting the amount of RAM the plasmashell process can consume. Systemd allows to automatically restart a process that consumes certain RAM.
But then I was told I shall provide scientific evidence of how much RAM shall be that, rather than choosing any arbitrary number.
I just told I had no idea what evidence means in this context, and that any high number would be better than no number.
To which my suggestion was rejected. Hence I made the work-around.
People wasting my time. FOSS doesn’t need nurturing, needs higher standards.