This is an odd idea, to reply to a notification… it isn’t ‘disabled’, email notifications are never something you can ‘reply’ to, a reply simply sends an email back to the sender - and the sender is the notification bot, not the forum post.
Is it really? Discourse can itself act as a mailing list1. It’s only
natural to allow users to reply via Email. Otherwise, what would the
point even be to have that feature?
Simply observing the header Discuss Kde Noreply should make this clear. It’s a simple automated system.
This is true, there is a From: header which specifically states that
it is a noreply email. However, there is another header of interest:
Reply-To: KDE Discuss <discuss-replies+77ff12[…]>
The email itself also says you can reply to the thread. Here is a direct
excerpt from the email given when replying to a thread:
[…] or reply to this email to respond.
If I went to my email, and saw that I could reply to a thread I am
active in by responding via Email, why shouldn’t I?
My experience with many platforms is that selecting a notification generally takes you to the origin of the content…
Notifications from Telegram open Telegram
Notifications from Web services open a browser at a relevant URL
And so on…
To reply, you must Visit Topic
I can imagine, but I don’t see how this fits here. I already explained
that I can use email to reply to topics so I won’t refute something
I’ve already at least tried refuting.
To be ‘disabled’ it would first have to be enabled, and I’m confident that this ‘feature’ was never enabled, not for more than 30 years already.
I imagine that it is enabled by default as soon as Discourse is set up.
Most Discourse instances I have used allow you to reply via Email.
This includes Kicksecure, Whonix, Fedora, etc. My issue is that it
doesn’t on KDE and I am curious if it was disabled or not.
(if the formatting is botched, that’s because I copied it straight from the Email I wrote in case this doesn’t work)