I’ve been accumulating issues. A good many from an attempt to run Plasma 6 on Rocky 9.5 and reverting back to Plasma 5.
I was 40% of the way to thinking I’d change distros.
“Blar blar intelligent AI terminal… I could try that on some issues.”
A week later with a cyclone and power out in the middle of it, I have zero issues yet to resolve. And everything that was done is written up in Obsidian.
I think youall need a look at the AI write up of the Plasma 6 install.
Only negative was that I’m now on the highest paid plan to complete stuff I’d started $50 a month. That’s for unlimited AI requests.
I’m using Claude FTR. I’m playing with a few AI tools so AI isn’t costing be $50 but something more.
There is an open source alternative that I haven’t tried Wave.
Yes I know, AI worry worry.
That said, I’m paying $50 a month! $600 a year. WILLINGLY! Is that X2 the cost of a Windows license? For a terminal?
I’m guessing that these projects are getting a kick back commission for selling AI tokens.
There would be a few options ATM
- Users make their own AI discoveries about what is useful.
- KDE bundle an existing product like Wave and perhaps get a commission.
- KDE developers go nuts on improving terminal and catching up with the bleeding edge, like Warp using an existing AI platform.
Or something else.
I’d like to know whose tried these tool, their thoughts on them and what buzz discussion are going on in KDE about this? If “we are ignoring it”, I’d say “stop it”.
It’s too good for the users for developers to ignore. That’s the bottom line.
I’d go so far as to say that within the forum we should have “get an AI answer” and be able to comment on those answers.
Also I note that Warp + Claude has access to the Red Hat knowledge base. I don’t have such a subscription. 
My conclusion from using Warp, whatever else this should be up with the #1 discussions. KDE puts a face on a text prompt. This is the new face of the text prompt. There’s no space to hide from this reality.